But man is not destined to vanish. He can be killed, but he cannot be destroyed, because his soul is deathless and his spirit is irrepressible. Therefore, though the situation seems dark in the context of the confrontation between the superpowers, the silver lining is provided by amazing phenomenon that the very nations which have spent incalculable resources and energy for the production of deadly weapons are desperately trying to find out how they might never be used. They threaten each other, intimidate each other and go to the brink, but before the total hour arrives they withdraw from the brink.
The main point from the author’s view is that __
A.
man’s soul and spirit cannot be destroyed by superpowers
B.
man’s destiny is not fully clear or visible
C.
man’s soul and spirit are immortal
D.
human society will survive despite the serious threat of total annihilation
The correct answer and Explanation is :
The correct answer is D. human society will survive despite the serious threat of total annihilation.
Here’s an explanation:
In the provided passage, the author reflects on the enduring nature of the human spirit and the paradoxical behavior of superpowers in the context of nuclear threat. The main point is that, despite the existential threats posed by superpowers and their creation of devastating weapons, there is a significant silver lining. This silver lining is illustrated by the fact that these very nations, while being armed with such destructive capabilities, are also actively seeking ways to avoid their use.
The author emphasizes that although the superpowers engage in threats and intimidation, they show a clear inclination to avoid crossing the point of no return. This behavior indicates a recognition of the catastrophic consequences of their actions and a desire to prevent total annihilation. Therefore, the focus is on the resilience and adaptability of human society in the face of dire threats.
The passage suggests that while the danger is real and present, there is an inherent drive within human societies to seek survival and peace, even when faced with extreme risks. The behavior of withdrawing from the brink of destruction indicates a profound hope and effort to ensure that these threats do not lead to the end of humanity. Thus, the central message is that human society, despite the serious threat of annihilation, shows a persistent capacity for survival and a determination to avoid total destruction.
In summary, option D captures the essence of the author’s argument that despite grave dangers, human society’s efforts to prevent total annihilation demonstrate its resilience and will to survive.